Matthew 28:19 (Misinterpreted Scriptures)

image_pdfimage_print

Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost…

Misinterpretation: The UPC points out that this Scripture says to baptize in the Name (singular). They go on to say that the Name is Jesus, and they quote Acts 2:38 as proof (because Peter instructed people to be baptized in the Name of Jesus). Unfortunately, the UPC believes that if a person was baptized in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, then their baptism was invalid and they are not truly saved.

Facts: I will not open up a debate on Oneness vs. the Trinity here, or a debate on whether or not baptism is necessary for salvation. Instead, I will say that I really do not think that Jesus is going to send the majority of His followers to hell for obeying Him. Think about that for a moment. Is Jesus really going to take a person who love Him and faithfully served Him, but was baptized in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost and send them to hell—especially when He was the one who told them to be baptized that way? Is that really the kind of God that we serve?

Furthermore, if the UPC view is true then the majority of so-called Christians for the last 2,000 years have gone to hell. I find it hard to believe that Jesus came to Earth, suffered, died, was buried, and rose again, just so that He could trick almost all of His followers into going to hell.

Finally, the UPC often claims that Christians baptized in the Name of Jesus until the Roman Catholic church came on the scene. They believe that the Roman Catholic church corrupted Christianity with the doctrine of the Trinity (which the UPC equates with polytheism) and a false baptism. However, recent historical discoveries make it clear that the early Church was baptizing people in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost at a very early date. The Didache–written between c50-250 A.D.–instructs people to be baptized in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost1. This means that it is very possible that the early Church was already baptizing people in the Titles when the Apostle John was still alive!

References:

  1. Youngblood, R. F., Bruce, F. F., Harrison, R. K., & Thomas Nelson Publishers. (1995). Nelson’s new illustrated Bible dictionary. Rev. ed. of: Nelson’s illustrated Bible dictionary.; Includes index ("Didache"). Nashville: T. Nelson. []

48 thoughts on “Matthew 28:19 (Misinterpreted Scriptures)

  1. Glenn Frazier

    Well let me say first and foremost, when Jesus Baptized People He could not Baptize them in His own name because that would have cause them to Arrest Him and try Him Earlier than what God had intended. But if you study the Bible it does have a Scripture that tells us to do all that we do in word or deed to do it in the Name of Jesus. With that being said, Baptism is in fact a deed and it must be done in His Name for His name Jesus is the only name given among men whereby we must be saved. So yes it must be Done in Jesus Name otherwise you are just a wet sinner.

  2. JAMES ASHMORE

    I think there are FOUR scriptures that no oneness pentecostal can honestly get around:

    1.) “We have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the world.” 1 John 4:14

    Note: If John had been oneness, he would have said it like this:
    “We have seen and do testify that the Father came into the world as His own Son…”
    This is ludicrous! If it was in fact the Father Who came, then it couldn’t be said that He “SENT” anyone!

    2.) “Grace be with you, mercy, and peace, from God the Father, AND-
    from the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father…” 2 John v. 3

    Note: If John had been oneness, he would have written instead:
    “Grace be with you, mercy, and peace, from God the Father who is our Lord Jesus Christ…”

    3.) If Paul were a oneness, he would NEVER have said:
    “Christ did not send me to BAPTIZE…”

    4.) “He came and took the book out of the right hand of Him that sat upon the throne.”
    Rev. 5:7

    Note: If Jesus IS the Father, how ludicrous could it be to believe He “CAME” to the One seated on the throne and TOOK the Book out of His own right hand???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *