What Does The Bible Say About Salvation?

image_pdfimage_print

Several weeks ago I got a request through email from a lady. This is what she said:

I was wondering if you could do a blog about what the Bible says about salvation? My husband and I are in a UPC church right now…and we are looking to get out. We studied and found that salvation is NOT speaking in tongues…but we want an exhaustive reference guide, from the point of a fellow ex-UPCer. We can refute Acts 2:38 up and down….but it’s man’s refutations. Can you point out exactly why speaking in tongues isn’t associated with salvation as well?

I discussed their request with my fiance Kali—also a former UPCer—and we thought that she raised a really good point. When we leave the UPC we often know what salvation isn’t but we’re not quite sure what salvation is. What does it even mean to be saved? Does it just mean that we’re heading for the great Gloryland in the sky when we die? Or is there more to it? And how do we get saved? Is it by faith? Baptism? Is baptism essential for salvation? There are so many different interpretations, so many different beliefs, that it becomes overwhelming to try to sort it all out.

My prayer is that this article will answer the question that the lady and her husband asked while also helping others who are asking the same questions.1

What Is Salvation?

In the UPC salvation gets a lot of attention. We toss around phrases like, "They love the Lord so much, it’s a shame that they don’t have the truth," or, "That song [by a Trinitarian singer] is so anointed, they’ve almost got it!" When we say all of these things what we are really saying is, "That person loves the Lord but isn’t saved," or, "That person has the Spirit of God resting upon them and blessing their music, but it’s too bad they aren’t saved." (When we stop and think about it in those terms it becomes apparent that it would be very strange that a person could love God and follow Him and yet not be saved, kind of like a cosmic game of hide and seek with people looking for Christ and never finding Him–the exact opposite of what Scripture says in Luke 11:9-13.) The point is, in the UPC we’re obsessed with seeing people saved, and that’s how it should be! Christians of all denominations should feel the same way. But in the UPC we’ve associated salvation with a theological understanding (Oneness) or an experience (tongues) or an action (dressing right). But is that what salvation really is? Is that how a person is saved? What does it really mean to be saved?

The word that most applies to our discussion is found in Acts 16:30-31, when a jailer of Paul was about to commit suicide because he thought that Paul had escaped:

When the jailer awoke and saw the prison doors opened, he drew his sword and was about to kill himself, supposing that the prisoners had escaped. But Paul cried out with a loud voice, saying, “Do not harm yourself, for we are all here!” And he called for lights and rushed in, and trembling with fear he fell down before Paul and Silas, and after he brought them out, he said, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” They said, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.” (NASB)2

The word that is translated as “saved” in the above verse is the Greek word sozo. It means "To save, deliver, make whole, preserve safe from danger, loss, destruction."3 Of the fifty-four times the word is used in the New Testament, "fourteen relate to deliverance from disease or demon possession…in twenty instances, the inference is to the rescue of physical life from some impending peril or instant death…[in] the remaining twenty times, the reference is to spiritual salvation."4 The references to spiritual salvation are the ones we’re interested in. Consider the following verses:

“She will bear a Son; and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.” (Matthew 1:21)

And with many other words he solemnly testified and kept on exhorting them, saying, “Be saved from this perverse generation!” (Acts 2:40)

Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from the wrath of God through Him. (Romans 5:9)

For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. (1 Corinthians 1:21)

Pay close attention to yourself and to your teaching; persevere in these things, for as you do this you will ensure salvation both for yourself and for those who hear you. (1 Timothy 4:16)

Therefore He is able also to save forever those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them. (Hebrews 7:25)

Therefore, putting aside all filthiness and all that remains of wickedness, in humility receive the word implanted, which is able to save your souls. (James 1:21)

At this point one might wonder why I stop to define the word "saved," since it’s certain that any reader with a background in Christianity will know exactly what I’m talking about. The reason is because I’ve seen quite a few debates about salvation online, and you’d be amazed at the number of people who throw Scriptures around about "salvation" when the type of salvation that the Scripture is talking about may not even be spiritual! Additionally, it’s important to remember that the method of salvation could be quite different depending on the era that a particular passage was written in. Some passages deal with salvation as a nation (Israel), others with salvation as a family unit, and others with salvation as an individual. Because of all this, I want to stress that this article is dealing with the spiritual salvation that we find in the New Testament–salvation that saves and delivers us from the wrath of God and ushers us into heaven.

How Is A Person Saved?

It’s impossible to discuss what it means to be saved without first talking about how to be saved. I know that seems backwards, but it will make sense in a moment.

The person who emailed me requesting this article made a really good point. She said, "We can refute Acts 2:38 up and down….but it’s man’s refutations." I think that a lot of people are in that same situation. They know what salvation isn’t. They’ve come to realize that it’s more deep than an emotional experience but more simple than what they’ve been taught. They’ve come to realize that a person doesn’t have to spend night after night at an altar sweating and pleading and crying and begging for God’s Spirit. They know what salvation is not but they don’t quite know what it is. Fortunately for us, the Bible makes it abundantly clear. That’s right. Very clear. The reason we missed it in the UPC is not because we weren’t intelligent enough. It’s so simple children all over the world understand it. The reason we missed it is because we put emphasis on the wrong things, twisted the verses out of context, then ran roughshod over the very clear teaching of Scripture–the very thing we accused all those Trinitarians of doing!

Consider the following passage of Scripture. Look at how plain the teaching is:

“As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up; so that whoever believes will in Him have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved [sozo] through Him. (John 3:14-17)

Now, we’ve been taught all our life that it was more complicated than this. After all, doesn’t "just believe" lead to "easy believism"? (No it doesn’t, but we’ll deal with that in a moment.) Isn’t this Scripture just one Scripture out of many that teaches us how to be saved? (If it is, then it’s really surprising that Jesus wouldn’t share the "whole plan of salvation" every time He spoke, since He must have realized that it would be hundreds of years before the New Testament canon was readily available to every Christian. As a matter of fact, neither Jesus or Paul or any other writer ever mentioned the UPC plan of salvation in any way, shape, or form.) But let’s not get sidetracked, because the point that I want to make is very simple: Salvation (sozo) stands in contrast to judgment. Let’s read verse 17 again, and tack on verses 18-21 as well:

“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. This is the judgment, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil. For everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come to the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But he who practices the truth comes to the Light, so that his deeds may be manifested as having been wrought in God.”" (John 3:16-21, emphasis mine)

Think about that for a moment.

To be spiritually saved is to not be judged. To be lost is to be judged.

How does a person stand before a judge and not be condemned? The only way is to be declared innocent.

And that leads us to the obvious question: How do I, a sinner, stand innocent before God? Or, to put it another way, how does a person get made righteous before God?

Scripture calls it "being justified," and there’s only one way, throughout all of the New Testament, that it happens, and that way is "faith."

Justification

The Greek word for "justify" is dikaioō and it means "to render righteous" or to "declare…one to be just…such as he ought to be"5. In other words, when we are justified we are rendered righteous and declared to be just. We’re made right before God. We who were once dirty and sinful are now clean. We stand innocent.

Paul liked the word "justified." He used it a lot. Consider this passage in Romans:

But now apart from the Law the righteousness of God has been manifested, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe; for there is no distinction; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; whom God displayed publicly as a propitiation in His blood through faith. This was to demonstrate His righteousness, because in the forbearance of God He passed over the sins previously committed; for the demonstration, I say, of His righteousness at the present time, so that He would be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus. Where then is boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith. For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one." (Romans 3:21-30, emphasis mine)

That’s a long passage, so let me sum it up: We’re not righteous, but God is, and God passed over our sins and declared us righteous based upon HIS righteousness, not ours!

Now, call me crazy, but it sounds like Paul is saying that people are justified (made right with God) through faith. It’s almost like what Jesus said back in John 3:14-17 when He said that people will be saved through belief.

But isn’t this just part of the plan of salvation? Where’s the speaking in tongues? If we’re made righteous through faith then what about Jesus’ Name baptism?

If belief is just part of a grander plan of salvation then both Jesus and Paul continually forget to mention it. Paul goes on to write this just a few chapters later:

But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart”—that is, the word of faith which we are preaching, that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved; for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses, resulting in salvation. For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes in Him will not be disappointed.” (Romans 10:8-11, emphasis mine)

As a matter of fact, Paul told the church in Corinth that he was not sent to baptize, and that he was thankful that he had hardly baptized any of them (1 Cor. 1:13-18)! Can you imagine a UPC preacher ever saying that? I’ve heard plenty of explanations in the UPC for that verse, but none of them did away with the simple fact that Paul esteemed preaching higher than baptizing, and he was comfortable thanking God that He hadn’t baptized a lot of people. If baptism was an essential part of the "plan of salvation" then I can’t imagine Paul ever penning those words.

And what about tongues? Paul’s comment on the matter was that not everyone speaks in tongues (1 Cor. 12:30). No mention of there being two types of tongues, never a mention in Paul’s writings (or anyone else’s) about tongues being the evidence of receiving the Holy Spirit. Instead, we find a tremendous emphasis in Scripture on belief along with an accompanying promise that it is sufficient for salvation. When we really stop and read Scripture for what it says, without trying to tie it in knots and make it say what we think it should say, then we find that there is little emphasis on baptism, no emphasis on tongues, but tremendous emphasis on belief.

We’ll talk about belief in just a moment, but first let’s look at a few more Scriptures that emphatically affirm that we are saved by the grace of God through faith in Christ:

In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation—having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise," (Ephesians 1:13, emphasis mine) (By the way, if you’re wondering when people get baptized with the Holy Spirit, then the above verse tells you. It happens upon belief.)

For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes. (Romans 10:4)

for “Whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved.” (Romans 10:13)

‘And it shall be that everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.’ (Acts 2:21)

and through Him everyone who believes is freed from all things, from which you could not be freed through the Law of Moses. (Acts 13:39)

They said, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.” (Acts 16:31)

Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ (Romans 5:1)

Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in Me will live even if he dies, and everyone who lives and believes in Me will never die. Do you believe this?”" (John 11:25- 26) (Sadly enough, the UPC would have to answer "no" to Jesus’ question, for the UPC does not believe that believing in Christ is enough to ensure eternal life.)

Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life." (John 5:24)

Yet for this reason I found mercy, so that in me as the foremost, Jesus Christ might demonstrate His perfect patience as an example for those who would believe in Him for eternal life." (1 Timothy 1:16)

Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and whoever loves the Father loves the child born of Him." (1 John 5:1)

Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him, and he in God." (1 John 4:15)

and that from childhood you have known the sacred writings which are able to give you the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus." (2 Timothy 3:15)

The promise of salvation by faith through grace is written all throughout the New Testament. It oozes out from between the covers of the Bible. But we in the UPC were convinced that there just had to be more to it. So we twisted Scripture (the thing that we had accused others of doing) and prodded and poked and cajoled and tied unrelated Scriptures together until we came up with a theology of salvation that is completely and totally unrelated to anything Christ or Paul or any other apostle ever said!

Now let’s talk about belief.

Belief

We see now that we are made right with God (a.k.a. "saved") by belief in Christ. But what does that mean?

The typical UPC view of belief is one called "easy believism." The view says that if belief alone is sufficient for salvation then a person can live a life of sin and still be saved. Now there are so-called Christians who believe that, but the UPC might be surprised to find out that those people are not in the majority. Every Trinitarian church that I have attended since leaving has taught strongly against sin. But is the UPC belief correct? Could a person just live however they want and still be saved? Does God just blink His eyes at sin and look the other way? Interestingly enough, Paul was accused of teaching that very thing, and this was his reply:

"What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin so that grace may increase? May it never be!" (Rom. 6:1-2a)

The Greek word that we often translate "believe" or "faith" is the Greek word pisteuō, and it is difficult to translate properly into English. You see, in the English language when we say "believe" we often mean "intellectual acknowledgment." For example, I believe (intellectually acknowledge) that Africa exists, but I don’t put my faith in Africa for anything. If I one day found out that Africa was a myth, the result of a global conspiracy theory, then my life would go on as before. Nothing would change (except for my belief in conspiracy theories). That’s intellectual acknowledgment, but it’s not biblical belief. It’s not pisteuō.

Pisteuō means both intellectual acknowledgment (to be persuaded of a fact) and faith (to put confidence in that fact, or to entrust oneself to it).6 Now, it’s entirely correct to say that intellectual acknowledgment of Christ would by itself lead to "easy believism." Sadly, there are so-called Christians who behave that way. They say, "Oh, I believe in Christ," and they go on about their lives without being changed. They’ve intellectually acknowledged Christ, but they haven’t put their faith in Him. Those people are often called functional atheists, and they’re no more saved than the squirrel outside my window.

To believe in the New Testament sense, though, requires a person to both intellectually acknowledge Christ as Lord and to completely entrust themselves to Him. It is a faith that demands action. If I had New Testament faith in Africa then I would intellectually acknowledge its existence and then move there and live completely off of African products. My life would depend on Africa. If Africa didn’t exist then neither would I. I would have completely entrusted myself to it for life, and if I was wrong then I would be dead. That’s pisteuō, and it’s the type of belief that we’re told to have in Christ.

When we believe in the New Testament sense we throw ourselves upon Christ for our salvation. We recognize that without Him we have no hope of eternal life. We declare Him Lord and pledge our allegiance to Him. It is a faith that demands action. Without action it’s not pisteuō.

That’s why God chose faith as the method through which grace works. You see, people often say that we’re saved by faith, but that’s not entirely correct. We’re saved by grace. Faith is just the catalyst that triggers it (Eph. 2:8). That’s why the proper phrase is "we’re saved by grace through faith," not "we’re saved by faith." (It’s true that the Bible often says we are justified through belief, but when read in context the underlying factor is always God’s grace. Apart from grace faith would be nothing.) Faith is our part, grace is God’s. We throw ourselves on Him for our salvation and He responds. If we try to work our way to salvation then that just won’t work. None of us can make ourselves righteous before God (Rom. 3:10). If we could work our way to salvation then we could boast (Rom. 4:2), but we can’t so we don’t. We throw ourselves upon God and He justifies us, He makes us right before Him. Then we have nothing to boast in except Christ crucified.

With all that in mind, this passage should make a lot more sense:

For I have been informed concerning you, my brethren, by Chloe’s people, that there are quarrels among you. Now I mean this, that each one of you is saying, “I am of Paul,” and “I of Apollos,” and “I of Cephas,” and “I of Christ.” Has Christ been divided? Paul was not crucified for you, was he? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul? I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius, so that no one would say you were baptized in my name. Now I did baptize also the household of Stephanas; beyond that, I do not know whether I baptized any other.

For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not in cleverness of speech, so that the cross of Christ would not be made void. For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. For it is written, “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, And the cleverness of the clever I will set aside.” Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. For indeed Jews ask for signs and Greeks search for wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block and to Gentiles foolishness, but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

For consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble; but God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, and the base things of the world and the despised God has chosen, the things that are not, so that He may nullify the things that are, so that no man may boast before God. But by His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption, so that, just as it is written, “Let him who boasts, boast in the Lord.” (1 Corinthians 1:11-31)

In other words, Christ did things exactly backwards–at least according to us humans (which means we’re the ones who are backwards). Instead of trusting in our strength we trust in God’s.To become strong we become weak. To become first we become last. Instead of trusting in our wisdom we become fools. Why? Because it’s not our wisdom and strength that saves us, it’s God’s.

How much more foolish could you get than being saved by not working? How crazy is it to win a battle by surrendering? But for those of us who are saved by faith it’s the power of God at work. Can we boast? Yes, but not in ourselves. Can we be proud? Yes, just not in us. The only One we can boast in is God.

We can’t brag about how long we spent at an altar or how we prayed through or the experience we had or how loud we spoke in tongues. We can’t even not brag about those things, because those things are irrelevant. We could spend 24 hours a day on our knees at an altar praying to speak in tongues, and if we ever did then it wouldn’t even matter. As a matter of fact we would probably be worse off because our faith would probably be in the fact that we spoke in tongues, not in Christ. We can’t boast in our wisdom or works or power or might or even our faith. The only thing we can boast in is the power of the God who saved us through His grace.

The Relationship Between Works and Faith

So we’re saved by grace through faith, but now what? What about all the Scriptures about works? After all, look at what James said:

What use is it, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but he has no works? Can that faith save him? If a brother or sister is without clothing and in need of daily food, and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and be filled,” and yet you do not give them what is necessary for their body, what use is that? Even so faith, if it has no works, is dead, being by itself. But someone may well say, “You have faith and I have works; show me your faith without the works, and I will show you my faith by my works.”

You believe that God is one. You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder. But are you willing to recognize, you foolish fellow, that faith without works is useless? Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered up Isaac his son on the altar? You see that faith was working with his works, and as a result of the works, faith was perfected; and the Scripture was fulfilled which says, “And Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness,” and he was called the friend of God. You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone. In the same way, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out by another way? For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead. (James 2:14-26)

Doesn’t this stand in direct contrast to Paul’s teaching? Doesn’t it show that all the Scriptures about justification through faith were just one part of a smaller plan of salvation? Don’t faith and works go hand in hand?

Yes, faith and works do go hand in hand, but not in the way that the UPC interprets it. You see, Paul says that faith leads to works. We’re not saved by works, we’re saved for works (Eph. 2:8-10). Consider this passage:

"But God, being rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in our transgressions, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), and raised us up with Him, and seated us with Him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, so that in the ages to come He might show the surpassing riches of His grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them." (Ephesians 2:4-10, emphasis mine)

There you see the relationship between faith and works. True faith leads to works. As a matter of fact, Christ has works prepared for us before we’re even saved! Works is an integral part of Christianity, but works are a result of salvation, not a cause of salvation. Because of this, James could rightfully say that faith without works is dead. If James preached that sermon in front of Paul then Paul would have given him a hearty amen! Paul and James presented two sides of the same coin: Paul said that faith leads to works, and James said that without works you don’t have faith. There’s no reason to think that there was a conflict between the two of them regarding the method of salvation, or that Paul was only preaching one part of the larger "plan of salvation."

What About the Scriptures That Talk About Us “Being Saved”?

Paul used the phrase "being saved" a couple of times. In 1 Cor. 1:18 he wrote, "For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God," and in 2 Cor. 2:15 he wrote, "For we are a fragrance of Christ to God among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing" (emphasis mine).

I have heard more times than I can count that these passages (and others like them) mean that salvation is a process. The people who teach this claim that we are never truly saved until we get to heaven. It may not be an official UPC doctrine, but I heard it in church after church. Are the people who teach this correct? Are we never truly saved until we die or are raptured?

In a sense the people who say that are right. In some ways salvation is a process. That’s why I defined the word sozo at the beginning of this article. You see, the type of salvation we were discussing is most closely related to justification–the idea of being made right with God. It is accurate to say that certain aspects of salvation are a process, but it would not be accurate to say that justification is a process. You see, justification is being made right with God. You’re either right or you’re not, there’s no middle ground. You can’t be partly justified, or 3/4 justified. You’re righteous or you’re not righteous, and that’s that.

When Paul talks about "being saved" in the above passages he is not talking about justification, he’s talking about sanctification. Sanctification is the English translation of the Greek word hagiazō, and it means “to make holy.”7 It would not be inaccurate to take every sermon that you ever heard about "holiness" and replace it with the word "sanctification." (The difference, of course, is that sanctification has nothing to do with appearance, aside from the commands to be modest and moral, and everything to do with the way that we live our lives.)

Paul wrote:

Even so consider yourselves to be dead to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus. Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its lusts, and do not go on presenting the members of your body to sin as instruments of unrighteousness; but present yourselves to God as those alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God. For sin shall not be master over you, for you are not under law but under grace.

What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? May it never be! Do you not know that when you present yourselves to someone as slaves for obedience, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin resulting in death, or of obedience resulting in righteousness? But thanks be to God that though you were slaves of sin, you became obedient from the heart to that form of teaching to which you were committed, and having been freed from sin, you became slaves of righteousness. I am speaking in human terms because of the weakness of your flesh.

For just as you presented your members as slaves to impurity and to lawlessness, resulting in further lawlessness, so now present your members as slaves to righteousness, resulting in sanctification. For when you were slaves of sin, you were free in regard to righteousness. Therefore what benefit were you then deriving from the things of which you are now ashamed? For the outcome of those things is death. But now having been freed from sin and enslaved to God, you derive your benefit, resulting in sanctification, and the outcome, eternal life. For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 6:11-23)

(Did you catch that? Paul was being accused of preaching "easy believism" too, and he responded with an emphatic command that grace leads to sanctification (holiness) not sin! As a matter of fact, if you read Romans you discover that Paul taught that people were more likely to sin when they were trying to be saved through works!)

When we speak of sanctification it is entirely proper to say that we are “being saved.” None of us are entirely holy yet, and we never will be. While we walk this earth we strive for holiness while recognizing that we will never achieve it. While on this earth we must trust in God’s grace to cover us. That’s what faith is. Therefore it’s entirely accurate to say that we’re “being saved,” but it’s not accurate to claim that we are not already saved. When we talk about “being saved” we are talking about sanctification, not justification.

In theology sanctification is often broken up into three types. The types sometimes go by different names, but I like to call them “present, progressive, and perfected.” “Present sanctification” is the holiness that is bestowed upon us at the moment of salvation when we are robed with Christ; “progressive sanctification” is the ongoing process of becoming more and more holy as we walk with Christ; “perfected sanctification” is the perfect holiness that will be ours when we are glorified. So we are justified (made right with God) and sanctified (made holy before God) at the moment of salvation, but we are also becoming more and more holy as we walk with God day by day.

Tying It All Together

A call to repentance

"Or do you think lightly of the riches of His kindness and tolerance and patience, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you to repentance?"
(Rom. 2:4)

"you were dead in your trespasses and sins"
(Eph. 2:1)

The first thing that God does is call us to Him. You see, we can’t even boast in our ability to seek for Him, because it doesn’t exist! God calls us, we don’t call Him. We’re lost, He’s the divine search-and-rescue party. He calls us to Him and we respond through faith.

It’s worth noting here that I firmly believe that repentance is an integral part of belief. I don’t think it’s possible to acknowledge the holy God as Lord and Savior without being moved to fall at His feet and repent. I don’t view repentance as a requirement so much as I think it’s a necessary reaction to faith. It’s true that we are commanded to repent, but I don’t understand how a person could even have faith without being moved to repentance. The two go hand in hand. After all, a person wouldn’t truly repent if they didn’t think the one they were repenting to was capable of forgiving sins, so repentance in itself is a statement of faith. Conversely, I don’t think a person can truly have faith without being moved to repentance. Therefore, I don’t see a tension in Scripture between the commands to repent and the fact that we are saved by grace through faith. Faith naturally leads to repentance.

A response through faith, leading to justification

For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. “For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him."
(John 3:16-17)

But God, being rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in our transgressions, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), and raised us up with Him, and seated us with Him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, so that in the ages to come He might show the surpassing riches of His grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus.
(Ephesians 2:4-7)

For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.
(Rom. 3:28)

We respond to the call by throwing ourselves upon the mercy of Christ, and trusting Him wholeheartedly for our salvation. We don’t try to work our way to God because He’s already worked His way to us.

When we are justified we are regenerated

Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come.
(2 Cor. 5:17)

We didn’t talk about regeneration yet in this article. It just means "being made alive." Paul summed it up when he wrote:

For the love of Christ controls us, having concluded this, that one died for all, therefore all died; and He died for all, so that they who live might no longer live for themselves, but for Him who died and rose again on their behalf. Therefore from now on we recognize no one according to the flesh; even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, yet now we know Him in this way no longer. Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come. (2 Corinthians 5:14-17, emphasis mine)

Justification and regeneration leads to sanctification

"For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ."
(Gal. 3:27)

"But now having been freed from sin and enslaved to God, you derive your benefit, resulting in sanctification, and the outcome, eternal life."
(Rom. 6:22)

When we are justified and regenerated we put on Christ. He takes our place and we take His. When God looks at us He sees Christ. We are no longer seen as unholy but as holy.

On a side note, there’s some debate over whether or not the "baptized" in Gal. 3:27 refers to water baptism or Spirit baptism. I don’t think it matters, because in the New Testament baptism was something that was done immediately upon a profession of faith. It was not until later that baptism was separated. The authors of the excellent book "Pagan Christianity" have this to say about baptism in the early church:

"[I]t is typical in most contemporary churches for baptism to be
separated from conversion by great lengths of time. Many Christians
were saved at one age and baptized at a much later age. In the first
century, this was unheard of.

In the early church converts were baptized immediately upon believing.
One scholar says of baptism and conversion, ‘They belong together.
Those who repented and believed the Word were baptized. That was the
invariable pattern, so far as we know.’ Another writes, ‘At the birth
of the church, converts were baptized with little or no delay.’

In the first century water baptism was the outward confession of a
person’s faith. But more than that, it was the way someone came to the
Lord. For this reason, the confession of baptism is vitally linked to
the exercise of saving faith. So much so that the New Testament
writers often use ‘baptism’ in place of the word ‘faith’ and link it
to being ‘saved’ (Mark 16:16; Acts 2:38; Acts 22:16; 1 Peter 3:21).
This is because baptism was the early Christian’s initial confession
of faith in Christ."

Therefore, I do not think we need to try to decide if Gal. 3:27 is talking about water or Spirit baptism. I think it’s safe to conclude that all believers in the New Testament were baptized.

Sanctification leads to glorification

"The Spirit Himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God, and if children, heirs also, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with Him so that we may also be glorified with Him."
(Romans 8:16-17)

"For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren; and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified."
(Romans 8:29-30)

When we are called home to heaven, either through death or the rapture, we will be glorified and will spend eternity with Christ. What a beautiful concept! I don’t think anything more needs to be said about glorification, because Paul says it best:

For all who are being led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God. For you have not received a spirit of slavery leading to fear again, but you have received a spirit of adoption as sons by which we cry out, “Abba! Father!” The Spirit Himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God, and if children, heirs also, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with Him so that we may also be glorified with Him.

For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that is to be revealed to us. For the anxious longing of the creation waits eagerly for the revealing of the sons of God. For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself also will be set free from its slavery to corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth together until now. And not only this, but also we ourselves, having the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our body.

For in hope we have been saved, but hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he already sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, with perseverance we wait eagerly for it. In the same way the Spirit also helps our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we should, but the Spirit Himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words; and He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He intercedes for the saints according to the will of God. And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose. For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren; and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified.

What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who is against us? He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him over for us all, how will He not also with Him freely give us all things? Who will bring a charge against God’s elect? God is the one who justifies; who is the one who condemns? Christ Jesus is He who died, yes, rather who was raised, who is at the right hand of God, who also intercedes for us. Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Will tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? Just as it is written, “For Your sake we are being put to death all day long; We were considered as sheep to be slaughtered.” But in all these things we overwhelmingly conquer through Him who loved us. For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 8:14-39)

What About Baptism And Tongues?

I think that these questions have been answered throughout the article. Still, it may be good to make a couple of comments about the relationship of baptism and tongues in salvation before we close.

As I already pointed out, baptism in the early church was just assumed. If you believed then you were baptized. There wasn’t any debate about whether or not it was necessary. Christ commanded it so the disciples did it, and that was that. For what it’s worth, I think that’s the way it should be today. Baptism was commanded by Christ, so when it’s possible it should most certainly be done. (I can’t imagine a scenario when it would be impossible to baptize by sprinkling, even if immersion were not feasible.) However, baptism is not directly related to justification. Baptism is a public confession of faith. Perhaps it has deeper spiritual significance, perhaps not. I honestly don’t know, because arguments both ways are persuasive. (I think there’s a lot to be said for baptism being a symbol of the covenant in the New Testament just like circumcision was a symbol in the Old.) What I do know, though, is that it was commanded by Christ and so it should be done, and that baptism does not lead to justification. Only faith does that.

Tongues is even easier to answer. There is no relationship between tongues and salvation. I can say that with total confidence. Tongues was mentioned three times in Acts (Chapters 2, 10, and 19) and there is every reason to believe that all three of those instances were nothing more than the gift of tongues at work. There is no reason to believe that tongues was in any way related to salvation. The Scriptural relationship simply isn’t there. The Spirit was present and in those three instances the gift of tongues appeared. It’s really that simple. Tongues was never taught as anything more than a gift by any of the apostles, and it was never even mentioned by Jesus.

Additionally, logic says that the Holy Spirit has to be given upon belief. After all, Romans 8:9 says that "if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Him." Yet we know that we are justified (made right with God) upon belief, regenerated (made alive in Christ) upon belief, and sanctified (made holy before God) upon belief. How could all of that happen and yet we still not belong to God? Yet if the UPC view of tongues is correct then that’s precisely what happens. According to the UPC plan of salvation we can repent and be baptized and still not be saved. Are we half saved? Two- thirds saved? How does that even work? It just doesn’t make sense.
If that’s not enough, then consider what Paul says in Eph. 1:13-14:

In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation—having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise, who is given as a pledge of our inheritance, with a view to the redemption of God’s own possession, to the praise of His glory. (emphasis mine)

Did I read that correctly? Did Paul just say that we are "sealed" with the Holy Spirit at the moment of belief? Yes, he did.

So we see, then, that tongues is nothing more than a gift of the Spirit. It’s not the evidence of receiving the Holy Spirit. If it were then everyone who believed would immediately speak with tongues with no delay. Common experience says that just doesn’t happen.

Conclusion

What does it mean to be saved? It means that we stand righteous before God. We stand before Him pure and holy, not because of the things that we have done, but because of the grace of God. Christ has taken our sin and shame and made it His own, and He has robed us in Him. We are in Him, and when God looks at us He doesn’t see our sins. He doesn’t see our failures and mistakes. No, He sees a person who is perfectly righteous and holy, not because of what we have done, but because of what Christ has done. Our so-called righteousness can never bring us where we need to be. We can’t pray hard enough, be baptized deep enough, or speak in tongues long enough to be saved. The only way to be made right and holy before God is through His grace, and that grace is granted through faith. That’s what it means to be saved.

References:

  1. Dealing with the entire subject of salvation throughout the Old and New Testaments would take hundreds of pages. If a person wants a good scholarly analysis of the topic then I highly recommend the International Bible Standard Encyclopedia article on it, which can be found here. In this article I’m going to deal with the more common use of the word. []
  2. All Scripture references are from the NASB unless otherwise noted. []
  3. The Complete WordStudy Dictionary, G4982, 1992, AMG International Inc []
  4. Ibid. []
  5. Thayer’s Greek Definitions, G1344 []
  6. Thayer’s, G4102 []
  7. “Strong’s Greek Dictionary”, G37 []

34 thoughts on “What Does The Bible Say About Salvation?

  1. Richard

    I find it interesting that in 1945 when the Pentecostal Church Incorporated and the Pentecostal Assemblies of Jesus Christ merged to form the United Pentecostal Church Incorporated, that there were groups that held two different doctrines on salvation existing in the newly merged organization. This is documented in the Pentecostal Herald, December 1945 edition, Vol. 20. No. 12, page 6.

    “Articles on such subjects as “The New Birth,” will be accepted whether they teach
    that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new
    birth consists of baptism of water and the Spirit. This is indeed the proper attitude
    toward the most vital subject, as we are all seeking after truth, and are confident that
    God will lead us into all truth by Hist Spirit”

    Here is a link to the web page: http://www.1stapostolic.org/oldpublications.html

    Coming into oneness from a Pentecostal background and already filled with the baptism of the Holy Spirit with the evidence of speaking in tongues. I wanted to be baptized in water but could not find anyone who would perform the baptism in Jesus Name. I then met two sisters from a PAW church and we started sharing about the Lord. They took me to their church and I got baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ. I attended that church for four years and heard the oneness doctrine of the Godhead.

    I always had a problem was with the salvation teaching. I believed and still do that one is saved when he or she repents and accepts the atonement that Jesus made on the cross and confesses Him as their Lord and Savior. I believe that once an individual is “saved”, they should be baptized in water and should seek and receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit.

    I attended a UPCI church for a time, but left due to the controlling atmosphere and the pastor preaching one doctrine from the pulpit, but practicing something else.

    I now attend a Word of Faith Church and the pastor has no problem with my belief in the oneness doctrine of the Godhead and baptism in Jesus Name. Our fellowship is based on the common belief in Jesus as Lord and the only way of salvation.

  2. Alvin Raines

    I wanted to ask about one verse. “Saved” sozo-
    As pertaining to spiritual salvation, what does this verse imply?

    Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned?

    Is it belief alone that salvation comes or belief and baptism as this scriptures says?

  3. Jennifer

    Hi Josh,

    What about Acts chapter 19 when Paul asks a group of disciples if they received the Holy Spirit when they believed in Jesus. These disciples believed in Jesus but had never heard of the Holy Spirit. If receiving the Holy Spirit was something that happens immediately upon believing why would Paul ask that question? This passage seems to make a clear distinction between believing in Jesus and having the Holy Spirit. Also, the verse says Paul placed his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them and they spoke in tongues. If there is no immediate outward sign (ex. speaking in tongues) of receiving the Holy Spirit, how did Paul know that these disciples had received the Holy Spirit? They believed before but didn’t have it… after Paul laid hands on them, they had it. Just wanted to know what your thoughts are about this passage, A lot of what you’re saying makes sense but I can’t reconcile it with this passage. Thanks.

    1. Josh (Site Admin) Post author

      Jennifer,

      That’s a great question. I’ve touched on it in other articles but I’ll briefly recap here.

      In Acts 19 it’s clear that the disciples Paul met did not have proper belief. “Proper belief” is a term I’m hesitant to use since it sounds like a cop out, but in this case it applies. Here’s what I mean.

      To understand the passage we have to understand two things about the surrounding context. First, in the New Testament church baptism was something that happened immediately upon belief. There was no delay (a waiting period wasn’t introduced until the 2nd century AD). Second, “disciples” didn’t equal “Christian.” Rabbis and teachers of the era all had disciples. This is what Paul was alluding to in 1 Cor. 1:12 when he wrote, “What I mean is this: One of you says, “I follow Paul”; another, “I follow Apollos”; another, “I follow Cephas[b]”; still another, “I follow Christ.”” The people Paul was writing to should have been identifying as disciples of Jesus but instead they were beginning to identify as disciples of a particular preacher.

      So in Acts 19 Paul meets a group of people who have some understanding of Christ but somehow Paul realized their understanding was incorrect or incomplete (that’s not explicitly stated in the text but it’s an obvious deduction). Regardless of how the conversation started, Paul eventually asked them if they had received the Holy Spirit when they believed. Their response was that they had not even heard about the Holy Spirit.

      Bingo. Paul immediately realized that their fundamental understanding of the gospel was incomplete.

      So he asked them how they were baptized. Their response? That they were baptized as disciples of John.

      Bazinga. Now Paul knows what the problem is.

      These disciples had heard of Christ but they had never placed their faith in Him. They were not disciples of Christ, they were disciples of John. Paul promptly fixed the problem by explaining that John himself was a disciple of Christ and that these men should be as well. The men responded to Paul’s message and were baptized. When they were baptized they were filled with the Holy Spirit.

      The interesting thing about this passage is that it proves the exact opposite of what the UPC teaches. The UPC teaches that it means belief is not sufficient for salvation. But look at Acts 19:2. Paul asks, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” In other words, Paul expected them to have received the Holy Spirit upon belief. When they told him that they hadn’t even heard of the Holy Spirit then he immediately realized they had not received a proper explanation of the gospel.

      His follow-up question (“how were you baptized”) also does not have the meaning that the UPC attributes to it. The UPC’s interpretation is that Paul was saying “Oh, you have to be baptized the right way to “get” the Holy Ghost.” Again, that’s not what Paul meant. He was simply seeking to find out how much of the gospel they knew. Once he figured out that they were disciples of John he had a starting point to teach them the full gospel message. (On a side note Paul was just awesome at taking people from wherever they were to a full understanding of the gospel. His sermon on “the unknown god” in Athens (Acts 17) was nothing short of astounding. The man was a genius.)

      So to summarize, Acts 19 shows that Paul expected people to receive the Holy Spirit upon belief. In the New Testament church baptism happened immediately upon belief. There was no delay. Belief and baptism were even used interchangeably in certain passages (like 1 Pet. 3:21). Paul’s sermon in Acts 19 was not “there are 3 steps to salvation and you didn’t do #2 right.” Instead, his sermon was “you should have received the Holy Spirit upon belief, but you don’t even know what the Holy Spirit is so you obviously have an incomplete understanding of the gospel.”

      Finally, regarding the outward sign, the UPC makes a serious logical error. Their error is to assume that if an outward sign happens some or the time then it must happen all of the time. In logic that’s cased an “error of extrapolation.” It’s easy to explain with an example: This morning birds were chirping outside my window. Yesterday morning birds were chirping outside my window. My parents have birds chirping outside their window. My grandmother has birds chirping outside her window. Therefore, everyone in the world has a window with birds chirping outside of it every morning.

      See the error? Premises 1, 2, 3, and 4 are true but the conclusion is fallacious. It’s an error of extrapolation. I took 4 facts that are true and extrapolated an incorrect conclusion from them.

      The UPC makes the same mistake regarding an outward sign: 120ish people spoke in tongues on the Day of Pentecost. Some believers in Acts 8 displayed an outward sign (although we’re not told what it was). Cornelius and his family spoke in tongues. The disciples in Acts 19 spoke in tongues and prophesied. Therefore, everyone who receives the Holy Spirit speaks in tongues.

      Sounds completely logical. Except…1) Tongues in the New Testament was speaking in a language that was KNOWN to the hearer but UNKNOWN to the speaker–something I’ve heard stories about but have never seen happen; 2) The disciples in Acts 19 spoke in tongues and prophesied, so if we use Acts 19 to extrapolate that tongues is the outward sign of receiving the Holy Spirit then we also have to include prophecy as one of the signs; 3) most importantly, Paul said that not everyone speaks in tongues (1 Cor. 12).

      Out of those 3 points 1 Cor. 12 is by far the most important. There’s no difference in the New Testament between “tongues as the sign” and “tongues as a gift”. Trust me, I looked when I was in the UPC. I looked for months. It’s an artificial distinction created by man to support a non-biblical teaching. That’s what it boils down to. When Paul said that not everyone speaks in tongues that’s exactly what he meant: Not everyone speaks in tongues.

      By the same token, there’s no reason to assume that there’s always an outward sign of someone receiving the Holy Spirit. There certainly CAN be–Acts 2, 8, 10, and 19 show that. But there area also quite a few examples of people being saved throughout Acts–sometimes in groups of thousands, like in Acts 2–with no mention of them displaying outward signs. So taking cherry picking 4 examples out of Acts that DID have a sign and using it to extrapolate a doctrine is the logical fallacy of extrapolation.

      So why is an outward sign displayed sometimes? That’s an easy question to answer. Paul lists several gifts of the Spirit, including prophecy and tongues. If someone receives one of those gifts when they receive the Holy Spirit then it makes sense that it would sometimes manifest itself immediately. That’s especially true in areas that are just opening up to the gospel. After all, the gifts of the Spirit aren’t arbitrary. They’re given for a purpose. The gifts of healing, tongues, prophecy, etc, ran rampant throughout Acts because they validated the message that was being preached. Don’t misunderstand me–I’m not saying that the gifts are no longer for today. The gifts of the Spirit are still active in the church and they will be until Christ returns. But that doesn’t mean that a particular gift will always manifest itself when a person receives the Holy Spirit. That idea is blatantly contradictory to the clear teaching of Paul in 1 Cor. 12.

      I hope this answers your question!

      In Christ,
      Josh

  4. Erica

    I currently attend a UPC church but have always had doubts, but after a close friend left recently I have been doing a lot more research into what I feel is ‘The Truth’. I find this idea of belief/faith and works as salvation to be very interesting. It does seem to make sense, however to say that baptism is not essential is still a struggle for me. How would you explain the scriptures where Jesus says you must be born again, born of water and of spirit? Found in John 3:5.

    1. Tammy

      The bible tells us to obey the Gospel. How do you obey the death, burial and resurrection? You Repent which is death, you are buried which is baptism and you are resurrected when you receive the Holy Ghost. This is the act of salvation. Repentance, Baptism and being filled with the Holy Ghost. Why would anyone want to take away such a beautiful recipe that was designed by our God. Let it be! Stop dwelling on whether you are already saved before or after you are baptized. God knows your heart. Just do what the Bible tells you to do and you will be fine. Did he tell you to Repent? Yes. Did he tell you to get baptized? Yes. Did he tell you that the Holy Ghost is a free gift to you and to your children? Yes. God bless you sister.

      1. Josh (Site Admin) Post author

        Tammy,

        We need to dwell on the subject of justification for a couple of reasons. One reason is because the doctrine has been twisted into many different forms by many different groups. People need to know what it takes to be saved. Every group has their opinion and many of those opinions do not align with Scripture.

        A second reason we should dwell on it is because the Bible dwells on it. Paul dealt with justification and grace time and time again. When the church at Galatia began to drift into legalism Paul didn’t say, “Don’t worry about whether or not you can be saved without circumcision, just do it.” When the church at Corinth began to focus on who baptized them instead of on the gospel Paul didn’t say, “Don’t worry about baptism, God said do it so just do it.” In both cases Paul took something that sounded good to human ears (circumcision) or something that was commanded by God (baptism) and pointed out that good actions done for the wrong reasons become bad actions. Paul went so far as to say that God had sent him to preach the gospel and not baptism, which meant that he saw a distinction between the two (1 Cor. 1:17).

        My article “What does the Bible say about ‘Better safe than sorry’?” deals with these points in more detail.

        Edit 10/29 – After reflecting on my reply I decided that the two examples I used–circumcision and a focus on baptism for the wrong reasons–were not the best illustrations to use. Those passages were fresh on my mind since I just got done writing about them. In the first case, circumcision is not commanded under the New Covenant so it doesn’t directly apply to Tammy’s comment. In the second case, baptism is commanded but the church in Corinth was beginning to do it for the wrong reasons. Therefore that example doesn’t directly apply either, although there are still some comparisons that we can draw (more on that in a moment).

        I think a better example to use would be the “infilling of the Holy Ghost.” Anyone who has spent time in an apostolic church has heard something like, “Why worry about whether or not the Holy Ghost is required for salvation? The Bible said it’s a promise so just seek it!” Now, all Christians believe that the Holy Ghost is required for salvation so when an apostolic preacher makes that statement he’s actually talking about tongues. That’s a topic in and of itself, but what I’d like to point out here is that most apostolics view the Holy Spirit as something that we seek instead of something that is promised. They will agree that the Holy Spirit is a promise and then turn around and say things like, “It’s a gift and you have to reach out and accept it.” Their view of “accepting” is to go to an altar and pray and pray and pray until you reach the exact right combination of “yielding” and “holding on” that the people praying for you say that you should do. Eventually–after moments, days, weeks, or years–you will probably speak in tongues.

        The problem with this approach is that it’s just not biblical. Paul wrote that we are justified (“saved”) and sanctified (“made right with God”) upon belief. This article has plenty of Scripture citations so I won’t repeat them here. Another thing that Paul says in Eph. 1:13 that we were “sealed” with the Holy Spirit upon belief. That statement fits perfectly with an understanding of salvation by grace through faith. The only response that is required of us for salvation is faith. After that the Holy Spirit is immediately given to us. No guarantee of tongues, although it sometimes happens, like in John 19 (in that case speaking in tongues was a spiritual gift that manifested itself alongside the gift of prophecy). No need to travail for minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, or years at an altar. No need to beg and weep and cry and attempt to find the right way to reach out and accept the gift. No, it’s just promised, and it’s promised immediately.

        Yet we can’t come to that biblical understanding of the Holy Spirit if we have an incorrect understanding of justification. If we don’t understand that we’re justified upon belief then it becomes easy to tack on extra “steps” of salvation. But when we do understand justification everything falls into place! We no longer have to explain away John 3:16 and other passages on belief. We no longer have to come up with reasons why belief is just one step in the salvation process. No, once we understand justification everything else becomes crystal clear.

        That’s why it’s important to study this. A proper understanding of salvation fixes dozens of incorrect doctrines that have popped up in the last 2,000 years. Yes, at the end of the day baptism is commanded and we should just do it. I agree with that. But that doesn’t negate the important of studying the topic of salvation. If we don’t do that then we begin to do the right things for the wrong reasons, just like when the Corinthians began to develop an improper focus on baptism. It’s no different than apostolics do when they develop an emphasis on tongues being the evidence of the Holy Spirit. If tongues is the evidence then it’s clear that not everyone receives the Holy Spirit upon belief. But the Scriptures clearly say that the Holy Ghost is given upon belief, so experience clearly shows that tongues is not the evidence. The same goes for baptism. If we’re justified upon belief then we can no longer say that baptism is necessary for salvation (although we can say that if a person refuses to be baptized–apart from health issues or other legitimate reasons that prevent them from doing so–then their faith was probably not sincere).

        End edit.

        In Christ,
        Josh

  5. Sister Tammy

    I believe that after Jesus told his apostles to go out and preach the gospel baptizing all people in the Name of the Father, Son and the Holy Ghost. (Mathew 28:19) that is exactly what they did repeatedly. I don’t understand why it is such a big deal to just do what Jesus told us to do.

    I agree 100% that all of that outward adornment stuff is a bunch of man made traditions, But Salvation is pretty cut and dry. They asked Peter, What do they need to do to be saved and Peter answered. Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call. (Acts 2:38-39) .

    Its not confusing at all! We are saved by God’ grace through faith and through are Faith we act out accordingly by obeying the Gospel which is the plan of salvation. Death (Repentance), Burial (Baptism) and Resurrection (The Gift of the Holy Ghost) (Romans 6: 1-4)

    Listen, I love UPC people. I pray that anyone who chooses to leave the UPC because of the traditions of men please hang on to the truth! The Devil wants you to get confused and loose focus on what you know is TRUTH! Every denomination has its issues and the UPC hopefully one day will open there eyes and see that millions of people would flock to there church and embrace true salvation if they would stop the “Man Made Tradition”
    The Holy Ghost will convict you to stop drinking, cussing, smoking, being immodest, etc…..

    I am seeking people who have truth. Meaning, You know that Jesus Christ is God! He died for you and me and he gave us a plan of salvation so that we could receive his promise the Holy Ghost which gives us everlasting life. A movement needs to begin! “Truth Without Traditions of Men” God Bless You All!

    Love Sister Tammy

    1. Layman316

      Sister Tammy,

      Correction: The Jews in Acts 2:37 did not ask Peter “what must we do to be saved.” The words “to be saved” were not spoken or even implied.

  6. renjen0911

    Josh I have
    What does it mean to be like Jesus? I grew up going to UPC too. but I am glad I found ur website it open wide my eyes… everytime I go to church and came back home and thinking do I do enough for God?am I ganna be in heaven?sometimes I felt like I have to speak in tongue to refills the spirit in me.. sometimes I just dnt feel like going to church because I dnt have the right cloth.. they keep saying our church dnt wear pant ir jewelry, I didnt hear them onec says that God dnt want us to wear pants or jewelry.. is it to be like Jesus is to change the way clothes? I am so confused.. if God draw me here in to ur webside then this is where I wanna learn more about him..
    God bless you…

    1. Josh (Site Admin) Post author

      Renjen,

      There is a terrific book called “Irresistible Revolution.” If you want to know what it means to be like Jesus then please, please read the book! Another book that is great is called “The Cost of Discipleship.” The second book was one of the inspirations for the author of Irresistible Revolution. They’re both life changing books, but the second is a much deeper read. I think that either one of those will answer your question. I think you’ll find that Jesus didn’t say much about makeup and jewelry (actually He didn’t say anything about those things) but He said a lot about things that most apostolic churches don’t do–things like feeding the hungry, clothing the poor, showing grace and mercy, and so on. There are notable exceptions to this of course, but the majority of apostolic churches put far more emphasis on how you look than they do on what you do.

      In Christ,
      Josh

      Sent from my tablet, please excuse any typos

  7. Brandon

    So much to say after reading the many contradictions in this article. The plan of salvation is unarguably faith. This is why James wrote about faith and works. He said very clearly that by works was faith made perfect and that faith without works is dead. Faith is the cause of salvation as the article said, but according to the Bible, faith without works is imperfect and dead. The apostles did preach this message many times. The article says that works do not cause salvation but they do perfect and make faith live, faith which does cause salvation. Major contradiction. When the Bible speaks of works not saving anyone, it refers to works that are not of faith.

    Paul said in Romans that we are buried with Christ by baptism that we also may rise as Christ did. Peter said that baptism was for the remission of sins. Paul was glad that he baptized only a few of the people in one instance because they did not understand and would have taught and believed in being baptized in the name of Paul. Paul asked men if they had received the Holy Ghost since believing and they answered that they had not heard of It. Paul immediately recognized the problem as baptism. Jesus was baptized to fulfill righteousness. The Spirit came on Jesus when He came up out of the water. Paul wrote that those baptized into Christ have put on Christ. Another major contradiction in this article is that it states that Jesus commanded, and that is a quote, to be baptized, but it also states that it is not necessary to be baptized. “And why call ye me Lord, Lord, and do not the things I say?” Luke 6

    There are multiple references where believers are said to be without the Holy Ghost. As I have mentioned previously, Paul asked men who had believed if they had received the Holy Ghost. Again in Acts chapter 8, people are said to have believed Philip’s preaching on the kingdom of God, AND they were baptized, but STILL had not received the Holy Ghost. Other apostles came to lay hands on the people that they might receive the Holy Ghost. If Philip preached it, and people publicly believed it, according to the article, they were going to Heaven. Is the article saying that one doesn’t necessarily have to receive the Holy Ghost to go to Heaven? That’s not what the Bible states in John 3:5. This is a contradiction of the Bible. Since I have proven the fact that the infilling of the Spirit does not occur at the point of belief, when does it occur? You rolled your eyes and guessed it, when you speak with tongues. This is first mentioned by Isaiah when he said that “with stammering lis and another tongue will he speak to this people.”(Isa. 28:11) When Perer preached on the day of Pentecost, he was responding to a question about tongues. The GIFT of tongues is what was spoken of by Paul in his Corinthian letter. The phrase “for they heard them speak with other tongues” is found throughout the book of Acts. The most important tongues-advocating verse is Acts 10:45-48. Peter incidentally commanded, another quote, these people to be baptized, too. Tongues is the evidence that God has filled a person’s heart, which is cleaned out by repentance and water baptism.

    In summary, we are saved by grace through the faith which is dead and useless without obedient works such as baptism. If one truly believes that Jesus Christ is Lord, he will obey all that Christ taught Himself and what was taught by Christ through the apostles. If you are not baptized in Jesus’ name and filled with the Holy Ghost as we are COMMANDED by God, your faith is dead and will get you no closer to Heaven than the judgment seat. The last thing I want to say is Matt 14:22 says, “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven,” and Mark 12:24 says, “Do ye not therefore err, because ye know northeast scriptures?”

  8. Dan

    “Do all speak with tongues?” I Corinthians 12:30

    -Nowhere in the Bible is there a distinction stated between the tongues in Acts and in I Corinthians 12-14. A simple fact that has to be accepted by anyone who has reading skills.

    -Some would ask: “Don’t the tongues in Acts show that everyone will speak in tongues the moment they are born again?” Ask yourself if that is logical: “Because something accompanies an occurrence, does that necessarily mean the same thing will always accompany a repeat of such an occurrence later, given that it is also not stated anywhere that it will?”

    -Each mention of “tongues” in I Corinthians 12-14 is concerning the same thing, the “gift” of tongues. This particular gift is actually the entire purpose of this section of Paul’s letter; he’s explaining things so that they don’t obsess over this one gift. Knowing this simple fact from simple contextual reading skills, we easily understand also that:

    “Praying in tongues” (I Cor. 14:14-15)=the gift of tongues (I Cor. 12-14)= not for everyone (I Cor. 12:30)=the tongues of Isaiah 28:11-12 (I Cor. 14:20-22)=the tongues in Acts (2:4-6, 10:46, 19:6)=the gift of tongues (I Cor. 14:20-22)=not for everyone (I Cor. 12:7,30)= does not always accompany the moment of being born of the Spirit [I Cor. 12:30; Acts 8:35-39; John 7:38-39 (Isaiah 12:3)]= an experience not necessary for salvation (I Cor. 12:30; Rom. 8:16).

    -It is unacceptable to think that we can sort out and decipher certain texts to hint that there is a distinction between the tongues in Acts and in I Corinthians 12-14 without it being stated already, and making an entire doctrine of salvation out of such “secret knowledge”. On the contrary, God has made the doctrine of salvation plain in his Word, over and over. If there is anything else that is to be learned about the Spirit and speaking in tongues, that much is foundational to the Christian faith concerning the subject (Rom. 10:9).

    “Do all speak with tongues?” I Corinthians 12:30

  9. Laurie

    Quick explanation I see some say…
    How about this:
    [37] Jesus said to him: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul, and with thy whole mind. [38] This is the greatest and the first commandment. [39] And the second is like to this: Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. [Matthew 22:37-39]

    For if you seek the face of Jesus, you will see the face of Jesus in others.
    So in Faith, you are led to serve in your deeds. With actions your spiritual connection to truth will grow – for the grace of God will shower you with His gifts.

    If a soul lives by the truth, the laws of God written in the hearts of all – they will be welcomed into the Kingdom of God as a Child of God.

    If a soul, baptised or otherwise, believes but does not seek to become like Christ, through “faith” which leads to fulfilling Jesus’ commandments – thereby bring to truth His simple words of “Follow Me” – it would be as if the mustard seed had fallen on baron ground. It is thy fruits that one will be judged. Your Deeds achieved by taking up your own Cross and following Christ. You must Love. You must Serve. By doing this, you live like Christ and you follow Him by hearing the truth in Matthew 22:37-39.

    To be like Christ, Humility & Repentance is essential. Least of which is due to the fact that we have Original Sin. To simply suggest through faith alone is arrogance and neglects the truths of humanity. Life is a purification process. Where we spend our eternity is based on our free will to follow. There is no easy path. No exceptions. The truth of obtaining Salvation is simple.

    There are 42,000+ denominations that have been started over the last 500 years with the majority of them separating themselves greatly from the truth of Christ as taught to all of Humanity through His original Church. The world will soon be greatly awoken from its great heresy to the truth.

    Do not judge the laws of God by the actions of man. For God’s law has been protected by the Holy Spirit. For God promised that His word would never be changed & the gates of Hell will not prevail of His Church established on earth on Peter, the Rock.

    Salvation is simple. For yes, the Kingdom of God is most easily obtained if thy approach the Kingdom of God like a little Child. One must drop their intellect. Approach Jesus with humility and with a pure heart, open to His graces.

    Salvation is made easier if you listen to the word of God. Yes reading the Bible. In prayer one also receives graces. Baptism marks ones Soul for eternity. The Holy Spirit is with these souls, guiding them to Salvation. Salvation is gained through maintenance of thy soul. Seeking truth, and through thy actions demonstrating the choices that each soul does for the Glory of God. One MUST follow Jesus. It is more than merely saying one beliefs for we all now actions speak louder than words.

    Salvation is made easier with the helping hand of Christ Himself. Like food for sustenance for the body, The Holy Eucharist is the sustenance we need for the soul! To not believe in the Eucharist, is not to believe in the perpetual sacrifice of our Lord to cleanse the sins from humanity throughout time. For Jesus’ died for our sins. Jesus humbles Himself as our Lord & Saviour at every Holy Mass. He offers Himself. It is our choice to first seek Him out and welcome Him into our Bodies, the tabernacle of our Souls. He still suffers for sinners & will continue to do so until His second coming. One who believes this truth, accepts that life is a continuous purification process. God only looks for our will to change and purify ourselves. He is ever and unfathomable merciful to those that humble themselves and ask for His forgiveness and with humility welcomes His true presence in the Eucharist, the Bread of Life.

    1. Josh (Site Admin) Post author

      Laurie,

      If “To simply suggest through faith alone is arrogance” then Jesus and Paul were the most arrogant among us. Scripture after Scripture attests that salvation is by grace through faith. Nothing more, nothing less. Many of those Scriptures are cited above. To read those Scriptures and then deny them is to deny the finished work of Christ. It’s to say that what Christ did for us isn’t good enough–that we can add to it by doing more on our own. This is what Paul called “another gospel” in Galatians 1:8-9, and he proclaimed a curse to anyone who taught it (cf. Gal. 1, Gal. 5).

      To say that “suggest[ing] through faith alone…neglects the truth of humanity” is to say that we know the truths of humanity better than Christ. It was Christ who fulfilled the law and instituted salvation by grace through faith. That is not a doctrine of man’s invention. When we are placed in Christ we become a new creature (2 Cor. 5:17-21). It is Christ who changes us from the inside out. I humbly propose that trying to add to the finished work of Christ is what is truly arrogant. When we do that we proclaim that the God of the universe didn’t do it right, and we can do it better.

      I believed what you said for many years, so I’m not trying to criticize or condemn. My prayer is that everyone who visits this site will come to understand that we cannot add to what Christ has done, and to try to do so doesn’t bring us closer to Him–instead it separates us from Him (cf. Gal. 5:4-6).

      In Christ,
      Josh S.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *