What does the Bible say about wearing make-up?


Anyone who is familiar with the UPC knows that the majority of UPC churches and their affiliates teach against women wearing make-up. The official position of the UPC on make-up is this:

Since the primary effect of makeup is to highlight sex appeal, we reject makeup as immodest1.”

However, since I spent my whole life in the movement I know from personal experience that this is not the view taught in the churches. (At least, I have never heard this view taught.) The argument against make-up that I always heard was taken from three Scriptures (2 Kings 9:30, Jer. 4:30, Eze. 23:40). The reason that it was taken from three Scriptures is because there are only three Scriptures in the entire Bible that say anything against make-up!

You see, make-up is a non-issue Biblically. Nothing was ever said about the subject positively or negatively.There are three Scriptures that make reference to make-up in passing, but none of the three even hint that make-up is a sin. Again, it’s a non-issue.

Unfortunately, the UPC takes these three Scriptures, twists them out of context, and creates a doctrine out of them. That would be bad enough of its own, but the situation is made worse because many UPC churches teach that wearing make-up is a sin. In other words, it’s not an optional doctrine in any UPC church that I’ve ever attended. (The one exception is a church that I attended for five years. The pastor–who I dearly love and respect–allows make-up as long as it does not change the base color of the skin. He is considered extremely liberal by many other pastors.)

In this article I am going to show what the Bible says about make-up, and then respond to the UPC position on the issue.

Is Wearing Make-up A Sin?

Now, if you’ve read my article on Jewelry then you read about how sin is defined. I’m not going to repeat it all here. Instead I recommend that you read the section of the article titled “Does the Bible Ever Say That Wearing Jewelry Is A Sin?” I will briefly recap the subject here by reminding you that the Old Testament Law (Exodus, Leviticus, and Deuteronomy) defines what sin is (Rom. 7:7). Everything that is a sin in the New Testament was also a sin in the Old Testament Law, but everything that was a sin in the Old Testament Law was not necessarily a sin in the New Testament.

The reason that I said that is to say this: The Bible never defines make-up as a sin. The Old Testament Law was completely silent on the issue, and the New Testament never mentions it at all!

What Does the Bible Say About Make-up?

As I mentioned at the beginning of this article, make-up is only mentioned three times in the Bible (2 Ki. 9:30, Jer. 4:30, Eze. 23:40). Here is what these three Scriptures have to say:

2Ki 9:30 NASB
(30) When Jehu came to Jezreel, Jezebel heard of it, and she painted her eyes and adorned her head and looked out the window.

Jer 4:30 NASB
(30) And you, O desolate one, what will you do? Although you dress in scarlet, Although you decorate yourself with ornaments of gold, Although you enlarge your eyes with paint, In vain you make yourself beautiful. Your lovers despise you; They seek your life.

Eze 23:40 NASB
(40) “Furthermore, they have even sent for men who come from afar, to whom a messenger was sent; and lo, they came–for whom you bathed, painted your eyes and decorated yourselves with ornaments.

One does not have to be a Bible scholar to see that none of these Scriptures say anything about whether or not a person should wear make-up! However, there is also a fourth Scripture that I often heard used to preach against make-up. It is 1 Tim. 2:9, which says:

1Ti 2:9 NASB
(9) Likewise, I want women to adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly garments.

You might be asking at this point how 1 Tim. 2:9 has anything to do with make-up, and that’s a very valid question! The confusion seems to come from a misunderstanding of the KJV translation of the Scripture. The KJV uses the word “shamefacedness” instead of “modesty.” As near as I’ve been able to figure out, many UPC preachers assume that “shamefacedness” means that a person shouldn’t wear make-up. The logic seems to be that it has the word “face” inside of “shamefacedness” so therefore it must be talking about make-up. This is an example of the sort of shoddy Biblical study that is done by many UPC preachers and pastors.

Overwhelming Evidence?

I think anyone will agree that these four Scriptures are hardly overwhelming evidence against make-up! The fact is, the Bible just doesn’t say whether or not a woman can wear make-up! We have to assume that if it mattered at all to God then He would have mentioned it at least once, right? Why should we have to take a few Scriptures that are hidden in the depths of the Old Testament and twist them together in a convoluted fashion to form a doctrine? It seems to me that God was pretty plain about the stuff that mattered to Him! For example, look at Gal. 5:19-21:

Gal 5:19-21 NASB
(19) Now the deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: immorality, impurity, sensuality,
(20) idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, outbursts of anger, disputes, dissensions, factions,
(21) envying, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these, of which I forewarn you, just as I have forewarned you, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.

That’s pretty plain, right? I just don’t think God’s sitting up there seeing how many people He can trick into going to hell! A god who does that is the antithesis of the God of the Bible!

A Few Questions for the UPC:

Here’s a question that I have for the UPC:

If make-up is evil because it enhances our sex appeal, then what other things are we not allowed to do?

  • Are we not allowed to wear deoderant?
  • Are we not allowed to brush our hair?
  • Are we not allowed to wear color-coordinated outfits?
  • Are we not allowed to wear matching socks?

You see, I really want to enhance my sex appeal! I’m 26, and I want to get married some day! Because of that I do all sorts of stuff to enhance my sex appeal! I brush my teeth twice a day, I style my hair, I make sure my socks match, I exercise regularly enough to keep the worst of the flab off, etc. What’s wrong with doing that? Just because a woman wants to make herself attracted doesn’t mean that she’s promiscuous! Every single one of us does things every day to enhance our attractiveness to the opposite sex!

Here are a few other questions:

  • If 2 Kings 9:30 is saying that make-up is evil because Jezebel used it, then doesn’t it also mean that we can’t look out the window?
  • If Jer. 4:30 is saying that make-up is evil because Israel wore it while they were backslidden, then doesn’t it also mean that wearing scarlet is evil?
  • If Eze. 23:40 is saying that make-up is evil because Israel wore it while they were backslidden, then doesn’t it mean that it’s also evil to take a bath?

Isn’t this all a little bit ridiculous?!


You see, this is the problem with UPC theology: It’s a house of cards. The UPC has made the claim that they and their affiliates are the only ones who possess Truth. But what happens when they find out that something they taught as Truth was wrong? It throws everything else into question! If they can be wrong on one point then they can be wrong on other points as well.

I believe that this is what is happening with make-up. The UPC has been backed into a corner. More and more people are seeing that there is absolutely nothing wrong with wearing make-up. There’s no Scriptural basis for not wearing it, and there’s no logical reason for not wearing it. Now the UPC is forced to defend a doctrine that makes no sense, because if they back off this doctrine then it might cause their members to doubt other doctrines as well.

This is why I believe that the Bible should be the ultimate rule of authority. If I find that I’ve misunderstood something in the Bible then I have no problem changing my beliefs. I don’t claim to have a monopoly on Truth. I claim that Jesus is the only way to God, not any one Christian denomination!

Folks, God doesn’t care whether or not you wear make-up! If He cared then He would have put it in the Bible! If you are a woman who feels that God does not want you wearing make-up then that is between you and Him, but God never gave any organization the right to dictate a doctrine that has no Scriptural basis as being necessary for salvation!


Featured Comment by Angela – May 22nd, 2012, 8:18pm (link):

Most of the comments above sadden me. I mean they really cause my heart to ache.
When are we going to realize that “being in the world but not of the world, “come out and be seperate”, and “peuliar people”, etc. have absolutely nothing to do with wearing make-up, a skirt, long hair, jewelry, etc.
It really makes my stomach turn to think that this is what the focus of salvation has become while the harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few. It wouldn’t surprise me to discover the laborers are few because we’re all squabling over what Sister Suzy Q wore to church last Sunday.

Last year I felt like I was being prompted to search out the word holiness. Having been raised Pentecostal/UPC, all I knew that holiness meant (to them) was associated with a manner of dress. This didn’t make much sense to me due to Hebrews 12:14. It reads, “Pursue peace with all people, and holiness, without which no one will see the Lord.” NKJV
I started with the definition of holiness since the Bible continuously states that God is holy, holy, holy. I had a hard time reconciling this to God wearing a dress. To be holy, according to bible.org is to be distinct, seperate, in a class by oneself.
Exodus 15:11 says, “Who is like You, O Lord, among the gods? Who is like You, glorious in holiness, Fearful in praises, doing wonders?”
It goes on to speak of His mercy and His stregth and His redemptive power.
I then went on to look up the word holy in Hebrew. The word is kadosh, and means to be set apart from the common, habitual or profane. Just to make sure I wasn’t missing anything, I then looked it up in Greek. Hagios (holy or sacred) means likeness of nature with the Lord, different from the world.

Yes. You are all correct. We are to be seperate from the world. We are to be Christ-like. We have to be IN the world, but we don’t have to be OF the world. I don’t think phrases like Christ-like and nature with the Lord indicates in any way, shape, or form that it is to be translated into a state of dress. What makes me say that? Well, take a look at how the Word described the world.

I Corinthians 5:11 – sexually immoral, covetous, idolater, reviler, drunkard, extortioner…it’s also interesting to note here who Paul was talking to and who he was speaking about and what he had to say in the follwing scriptures. The people he is describing here are “BROTHERS”. We tend to do things the exact opposite of what the Bible tells us. We judge those on the outside, while “eating and drinking” with those on the inside who are committing these sins and claiming to have Jesus in their hearts. Wow.
I Corinthians 6: 9-11 Unrighteous, fornicators, idolators, adulterers, homosexuals, sodomites, thieves, covetous, drunkards, revilers, extortioners…AND SUCH WERE SOME OF YOU. Double Wow.
Galations 5:19-21 THE WORKS OF THE FLESH ARE EVIDENT, which are: adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, idolatry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies, envy, murders, dunkenness, revelries
Those are just a couple…
Folks, THIS is what the rest of the world is like and THIS is what we are to be seperate from! We are to be a light! When I’m handed the paper at work and told, “See what your horoscope says!” My response should be, “No thanks, my future is in the hands of God.” I’d label that as sorcery of a sort. Correct me if I”m wrong… When I discover that my husband has put my brand new dry-clean only dress in the wash after I’ve told him fourteen dozen times not to, do I yell, scream and throw a fit? Outbursts of wrath. When I join the praise team at church because I have such a beautiful voice and I want everyone to know it, and that guy who runs the local recording studio will be at church Sunday….wouldn’t that be selfish ambition not to mention a few others?
We don’t think of “sin” as being done in this type of scenario. Does it make it any less sin?

Grace – Josh, somewhere on this site, you made a statement that really blew me away AND gave me confidence to stop second guessing myself. You said something to the effect of because we are not perfect, we do the best we can and trust that God’s grace is sufficient to cover what we mess up. I would sure hate to think that the tattoo I got while I was in the world (but knew enough of the truth to live right) was going to be the deciding factor as to where I spent eternity. That’s one (tattoos) I haven’t studied enough to have an opinion on one way or the other, but I can tell you I don’t regret getting it. I still like it! It would kill me to know that because I’m on my second (and last) marriage that I couldn’t have a mansion just over the hilltop. What we refuse to recognize though is that God’s grace doesn’t end when you accept His gift of salvation. It is His grace that covers those little slip ups we make….just like His grace covers my having been married once already. Thank you God!

What we wear, what we apply to our faces, how we speak, how we treat others…it all comes back to one major point. It is a heart condition. When your heart is holy, you will live a holy life. Your dress will be modest, your speech will be holy, things will be ORDERLY (yes, God likes order) and in moderation.

There isn’t anything wrong with wearing make-up. There isn’t anything wrong with ladies wearing tasteful pants, blouses, jewelry, dying hair, etc. (I can not for the LIFE of me listen to Joyce Meyer and think, “It’s just too bad she doesn’t have the truth.”) However, the minute you have applied any of the above mentioned with the the wrong motive in your heart, there’s a problem. The great thing about the Holy Ghost is that if He indeed lives in your heart, THAT is when conviction falls. Choosing to ignore that conviction is the sin. Not the action itself. I’d also like to point out that the Holy Ghost DOES NOT convict with condemnation. I keep seeing comments posted from individuals who have stated they have felt condemned over something they did. If you feel condemed (as my Pastor says) that’s the devil! My God is gentle and loving and kind and just. And yes, He is jealous and you don’t wanna rile His wrath, but wrath doesn’t come until you have repeatedly ignored His gentle warnings.

I read a few comments on here containing points I wanted to address. I hope that’s alright.
The first one was someone mentioning that her sister in law knew nothing of the Bible, but after receiving the Holy Ghost, threw her pants, make-up, etc. away. – My thought on that is this; if I were in a book club that met every Tuesday evening to talk about the chapter they read, I would make sure I was reading the same book they were. I wouldn’t want to show up with The Grapes of Wrath if they were reading To Kill A Mockingbird. If someone from the world is going to join the Amish culture, I’m sure they wouldn’t feel quite right about wearing bright red blouses and Guess jeans. I am by no means denying the power of a Holy Ghost conviction, nor am I doubting she has one. She very well may, but personally, I don’t find that the arguement that she threw it all out after receiving the Holy Ghost to be enough to convince me.

Second -make-up is not made by God…. – neither are twinkies.
Neither is Accutane or Benzoyl Peroxide, but I can guaranty you that if you have the means, you will take your child to the dermatologist to aquire either to clear up a case of acne that your kid is being picked on at school about. Is that not vanity? Should you let your child continue to be made fun of because we are not to alter our natural state or because Jesus said we would be persecuted for His name’s sake? I don’t think the persecution he spoke of had anything to do with make-up or dress or jewelry, etc.

Third – Make-up makes you sexually attractive.- Umm….I’m simply going to say…REALLY think about that. I hesitate to make the comment I want to out of consideration for other’s feelings and the way it may be percieved. I will say Linda Tripp before …alterations.

Fourth – Man can not see your heart. – OF COURSE NOT!! Matthew 7:16 – You will know them by their fruit – and I do not recall any one of the fruits of the Spirit being au natuale faced. Now back up for a second to the scripture I mentioned above. I Corinthians 5:11 – correct me if I’m wrong, but Paul WAS talking about those IN the church. How were the “righteous” to know not to associate with them? They were to test the Spirits! I’m sure most of the offenders were not walking around bragging on their exploits so that the “righteous” knew not to associate with them.

Fifth – Are you putting on make-up to entice someone or to look nice or better? – How many times have you stood in front of the mirror before Sunday evening church service or a date with hubby…or wifey, thought your outfit didn’t LOOK GOOD on you and changed? I will raise BOTH hands on that one!
When you were shopping and tried on that skirt that was so cute on the hanger, and it ends up being hideous on you cause it makes your hips look ten feet wide, are you going to go on and buy it cause it downplays your natural attributes?

Sixth – Pastor’s were given to us to convey these safety nets – Pastor’s were given to desciple what has ALREADY BEEN GIVEN! I recently read a FB post by a Pastor on this exact issue. He said, (and I quote) “The saints can NEVER make up the RULES. GOd does and he gives them to his ministers.” Again…the “rules” have already been given! If God decides to make new ones, it won’t be a secret for the ministers to impart to the congregation. The saints will have the revelation too, and if you disagree with me, then I’d say that you were thinking one in the body of Christ higher than the other.
Frankly, his comment sounded like a Pharisee to me. And no, I am not judging. I have formed an opinion. LOL!

Seventh – Pastor’s want real holiness – By who’s standards and definitions?
I sometimes wonder what heart sins a man making all these rules for his congregation has. I question whether or not he is trying to keep himself out of trouble.

Eighth – Lust of the eye was mentioned – Lust of the eye is mentioned as one of the three sins. All sin falls into one of three. Lust of the eye, lust of the flesh, pride of life. All revert back to the heart. It’s a heart condition. I think Chris Helmsworth is great eyecandy! I do not covet him. With that thought in mind, let me point out that the Bible placed emphasis on beauty when it was possessed. Esther was “lovely and beautiful” according the the book of Esther, and STILL had to go through 12 months of beauty treatment! Just for the sake of arguement, let’s say she refused make-up to enhance her natural beauty….to her face during those beautifying treatments for fear of sinning. She was still treated with oils and “preperations for beautifying women” on the rest of her body!
Rachel was “beautiful of form and appearance” according to Genesis.
Abram said to his wife that she was a “woman of beautiful countenance” in Genesis 12:11.
‘m sure many would argue…”See. The women were beautiful in their natural state!”
What about Leah?

I have fasted, prayed and studied over the past few weeks while asking for wisdom and knowledge to find truth in the scriptures. Not what I want them to say, but what they actually say. I believe God led me to this site. Earlier this year, I received prophesy in which He stated that there had been many fragments and pieces of truth scattered here and there throughout my life, but He was going to bring them together in solidity and confidence. I know He is doing that.
I read this quote today actually, and find it very appropriate for all that this web-site encompasses.
“No man ever believes that the Bible says what it means; he is always convinced that it means what he says.” George Bernard Shaw

When we as Christians wake up and realize that there is a hurt, lost world out there aching to know the Master, these issues will seem so minute. Let the walls of division fall. Jesus said in Mark 9:40 For he who is not against us is on our side. For whoever gives you a cup of water to drink in My name, because you belong to Christ, assuredly, I say to you, he will by no means lose his reward.

Read that story. When John tells Jesus, “we saw someone who does not follow us casting out demons in Your name…” think about inserting a denomination in there. Jesus, we saw the Baptist casting out demons in Your name. Jesus, we saw the Protestants casting out demons in Your name…
There had to be SOMETHING different about them if John referred to them as “someone who does not follow us”.

In Love,

  1. United Pentecostal Church International, Position Paper on Modesty, Accessed 2006-12-21 20:02:31 []

236 thoughts on “What does the Bible say about wearing make-up?

  1. Chrisony

    If God says something isn’t good, who are we to say it is good?
    The old Testament too is a Bible. Normally, when dealing with issues like this,many pastors don’t want to preach about this with the fear of losing their members but will tell you Jesus came to die for us and so the old testament was meant for the Jewish.
    When it’s about marriage, tithing,offering etc they quickly refer to the old testament .
    I need explanation.
    Deuteronomy 4:2 says;Donot add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the LORD your God that I give you.

    1. Josh (Site Admin) Post author

      Chrisony, pastors aren’t afraid to preach the Old Testament; they just realize that the Mosaic Law was fulfilled by Christ. The OT law is divided into 3 categories: judicial, ceremonial, and moral. The moral law is the set of laws that was repeated in the New Testament and is still considered valid today.

      You can disagree with that if you like, as long as you understand that you are standing alone against 2,000 years of Christian theology. Being in the minority doesn’t mean you’re wrong of course, but it does mean that you might want to take a step back and think about why almost every theologian for the last 2,000 years disagrees with you :-)

      Edited to add: You’re right that pastors often hearken back to the OT when it suits them. Tithing is a great example. In the NT we’re instructed to give as we are able to. Tithing is never taught. Pastors frequently jump back to Malachi or Genesis to try to explain why it’s still necessary today (it’s not ). That’s incorrect and they shouldn’t do that.

      In Christ,

  2. Chrisony

    I totally disagree with the writer. In your earlier submission, you made mentioned of and I quote”Everything that is a sin in the New Testament was also a sin in the Old Testament Law, but everything that was a sin in the Old Testament Law was not necessarily a sin in the New Testament.”
    Let me cite this example; In the Old Testament, Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 speaks against man lying with mankind which was not said in the new Testament. So are you trying to say it isn’t a sin?
    So come again Mr writer!

    1. Josh (Site Admin) Post author

      Chrisony, homosexuality is written about in Romans 1 and 1 Cor 6. It’s also mentioned in 1st or 2nd Timothy. I’m on my phone and don’t remember the reference off the top of my head.

      What I said was correct. Everything that is a sin in the New Testament was also a sin in the Old Testament, but the converse is not true.

      In Christ,

  3. Pingback: What Does the Bible Say about Makeup? | Beauty in the Bible

  4. Pingback: Does the Bible Condemn Makeup? | Beauty in the Bible

  5. Pingback: Does the Bible Condemn Makeup? | beautyinthebible

  6. MARIA

    The Word of God tells us that our righteousness is like filthy rags. We need to remember that we are saved by Grace (Eph 2:8).We are saved by Grace not of words lest any man should boast, It is a gift of God. (We can not earn it and do not deserve it.. It is what Jesus did for us, He paid the price. It is not what you do. you. cannot save yourself. Jesus cam to die for our sins. Yes be modesty and remember first their needs to be repentance of our sins, Jesus does forgive our sines and remembers them no more. St. John 3:3 speaks about being born again. Read Romans 10:8,9,10
    If you have a question always get answered with scripture to back it up. Have a Blessed day.

  7. Lynn

    This does not throw everything else into question. I understand the concept and its importance completely. It wasn’t too long ago that makeup was something only prostitutes wore. There’s a reason why Jezebel’s characteristics told by the writer highlight her face painting (makeup). Makeup doesn’t get you a husband, but showing that you have hygiene and manners is important for and to everyone, for every reason. A man can tell if you take care of yourself better by seeing your natural face. If you eat a lot of junk, don’t drink water, and don’t get adequate amounts of sleep, it shows on your face. But makeup covers it all up…

    1. Josh (Site Admin) Post author

      Lynn, I doubt it’s been true in any culture, ever, that only prostitutes wear make-up.

      The Jezebel argument is a classic example of reading something into Scripture to attempt to prove something that you already believe. The story of Jezebel is a historical account of something that happened, it’s not a doctrinal teaching. Chances are the face painting was not something that we would recognize as make-up today; it’s more likely that it was related to a pagan ritual. (No, I’m not saying that wearing make-up is related to pagan rituals; I’m saying that this passage is probably not talking about make-up in the traditional sense.) Another possible interpretation is that she knew she was going to die and she wanted to look her best. That’s a common human reaction before executions.

      Ultimately it doesn’t matter why she did it, because make-up wasn’t taught against in the Mosaic Law, much less the New Testament.

      In Christ,

  8. LaKoya

    Let’s go to the core, way back to the beginning of YOU, you and your walk. How did you end up in “the church”, were you born and raised? Did a family member, friend, co-worker etc convert you? Did God speak to you and direct you straight to the church?

    Most of the people that I’ve met while being in the religion were born and raised. My mother and I were not, but she is now remarried and raising all three of my siblings in this, what I believe to be a cult.

    Most of the girls I met at my church, camps, events were more messed up than the girls I attended public school with. So many vain girls. Forget makeup when you have long hair that takes you more than 20 mins to do because you’re burning it with a curlying iron and hair spraying the living daylights out of it to get it perfect…shouldn’t you be happy with the way God made your hair? Straight, wavy, bushy, curly, thick or thin, God made it a certain way, why are you altering it? Same goes with clothes, Ok your dress is down to your knees but you picked it out specifically, right?!?!…. why?!? Because it goes with your skin tone, it’s cute, it brings out your eyes, hides your stomach, or fits your shape…same with purses and watches..many UPC girls spend LOTS of money on very nice, sometimes even colorful flashy shoes, brand name purses and watches….Some girls even shave their mustaches and legs…. or do their eyebrows, God put hair there didn’t he?! And when you shave it, it grows back doesn’t it?!? He must really want it there…LOL there are even girls who go tanning!! Something that harms one’s skin, causes pre aging and is a common cause of skin cancer (not being sarcastic here)….AND too God gave you whatever skin tone you have so why alter it, Right?!?!
    LOL So ok putting cover up on my face to make my skin tone even out IS vain, putting on some bright pink nail polish might be flashy, a necklace may be a little shiny, and wow my mascara really did make my eyes pop out….. BUT if these things are self centered or vain, than so are ALL of the other things I mentioned. If you’re a christian than yes, I believe being respectful of your body and the temple God gave you is important.

    Than why are tons of the people in this religion overweight and fat? My mother’s UPCI pastor announced to his church just this past year that he now has diabetes. Where is the line between loving yourself, taking pride in yourself and taking care of yourself and vanity?!?! Your body is your temple, yet he’s shoving his face with deathly foods? His weight and obsession with food got to the point of being diabetic?!? And this is allowed..?! That’s very serious, more serious than makeup and vanity in my book, or a doctor’s for that matter. He knowingly kept putting in harmful foods to his body…putting on weight that hurts his health and body…There are many many clear scriptures on gluttony and how God sees it…


    You’re telling me it’s ok to be FAT, but I can’t wear makeup, jewelry because YES it does look good, it does make my outfit more attractive, yes it does compliment my eyes or bring out my check bones, However on the flip side you’re suppose to be able to just eat your McDonalds and your crusty processed fake foods, again and again, repenting after you shove your face with another hostess cupcake?!? Perhaps even lose a leg in the future due to becoming a diabetic…LOL alrighty than.

    And I apologize maybe I’m being too cruel, but this is how their teachings sound to me. I am all for doing whatever makes you happy or brings you genuine joy in life (without hurting yourself or others) so there’s no judgement, but I’m just pointing out some key points, sense people in this religion are so intrigued by their doctrine….

    This religion contradicts itself wayyyyyy tooooooo muuuuuuuuuch!!!! It wasn’t even established until 1945, so where was salvation in the 1400s, 1600s, 1800s?!?! So many people are in this religion because it’s all they know, and they fear parents and friends won’t accept them if they even think about “backsliding”. There are so many lukewarm people in this religion, in it because it’s all they know and they’ve never investigated anything for themselves. They’ve put all their faith into a pastor or a parent, or a leader…I am empathetic towards narrow minded people in this religion (not all our…can’t generalize the whole group) I hope that one day my siblings will look further into the world and different teachings, investigate history, speak to Jews, Muslims, Jehovah Witnesses etc branch out and figure out their salvation entirely on their own.

  9. carmen

    I love and totally agree on this article! I am a leader in a spanish pentecostal church that also follow man’s dogma. I often time have discuss this issue and the issue of facial hair on my husband. You see, if my husband doesn’t shave he is told that he cannot take part in church. We have numerous times asked the brothers where in the bible does it say that a man has to be clean shaven to serve the Lord or even take part in church? No responce, they say well, it doesn’t look right.
    Well didn’t Paul say bee imitators of me as i am of Jesus! And didn’t Jesus have facial hair??

  10. ian david

    Excessive make-ups disrupts your beauty and I believe UPC teaches about referencing God and I trust God wants you to present yourself modestly before God and men. women sometime are controlled with lust of the flesh as the world system drives them too far from God’s concept of personal presentation. Women ought to present themselves with modesty and with reference.
    The Bible tells us to cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit and perfecting holiness in the fear of God (2 cor7:1)

    1. Josh (Site Admin) Post author

      Ian, no, excessive make-up doesn’t disrupt beauty. It just isn’t what you find beautiful. And that’s your right. We all have different ideas of what beauty is. But please don’t try to twist Scripture to force others to your way of thinking. Wearing make-up is not filthiness of the flesh and it’s not unholy.

      In Christ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *